From Hobbyists to the World: Bitcoin’s Breakout Phase
Link to the full Research in PDF
“Institutions cannot self-custody without severe regulatory issues. Most individuals would prefer not to self custody. Crypto will remain a sport for hobbyists unless this is fixed.” - Bill Ackman
Introduction
In 1998, a Fortune 500 CFO stared at an e-commerce checkout page asking for his credit card number. The idea seemed insane. He closed his laptop and drove to the store instead. Today, that same executive manages billions in digital transactions without a second thought about online security.
Bitcoin faces this exact same inflection point. The radical self-sovereignty that propelled it to $2.3 trillion by enabling true ownership without intermediaries has become its greatest obstacle to reaching universally safe and secure access. While institutional demand surges, custody concerns remain the primary barrier preventing large-scale adoption. A 2024 Fidelity Digital Assets survey reveals 60% of institutional investors avoid crypto due to custody risks.
Just as personal computers, the internet, and smartphones escaped their hobbyist phases through breakthroughs in usability, security, and standardization, Bitcoin custody is waiting for its unlock. But here the stakes are far higher: losing access to a phone or fumbling with an early PC meant frustration; losing access to Bitcoin - or trusting it to the wrong custodian - means catastrophic, irreversible loss.
MIC represents the next leap in Bitcoin’s evolution from enthusiast-only technology to mainstream, institutional-grade infrastructure.
The Custody Crisis: Bitcoin’s Hobbyist Phase
Bitcoin custody today resembles early personal computers or ham radio equipment. The technology is undeniably powerful, but it’s trapped in a hobbyist phase by poor user experience and operational complexity that excludes mainstream adoption.
Hackers stole $2.2 billion from exchanges and custodians in 2024, with private key compromises representing nearly half of all stolen cryptocurrency. Meanwhile, an estimated 20% of all Bitcoin sits permanently lost due to user errors. This failure rate would shut down any traditional financial system within weeks.
Self-custody forces users to become cryptographic security experts overnight. Hardware wallets, paper wallets, and DIY multisig setups have worked for technically sophisticated users willing to manage complex operational security, but still resulted in lost funds for others.
The losses have come from overconfident users mismanaging their assets, as well as acts of god and physical attacks. Those who are unable or unwilling to treat their bitcoin security as a hobby have been unable to securely allocate to the industry, which has resulted in losses from exchange hacks and fraud, or completely limited interested industry participants from putting on a position.
Further, asking corporate treasurers or institutions to self-custody bitcoin for shareholders and investors is misaligned with corporate governance, internal controls, and audibility. It concentrates key-person and operational risk in a single desk, creates continuity and succession liabilities, and deprives the company and its auditors of third-party control attestations.
Centralized custody offers the opposite trade-off: operational simplicity that creates existential risks. The FTX collapse demonstrated how even sophisticated institutional platforms can evaporate overnight, taking customer funds with them.
In 2025 alone, over $2.17 billion has been stolen from cryptocurrency services, with the year already exceeding the entirety of 2024’s losses. The February 2025 ByBit hack, executed by North Korea’s Lazarus Group, stole $1.5 billion in a single attack, representing the largest crypto theft in history. DMM Bitcoin lost $308 million in May 2024 and was forced to shut down permanently by December. WazirX suffered a $235 million breach in July 2024, with hackers exploiting multisig wallet vulnerabilities. Private key compromises now account for 43.8% of all stolen cryptocurrency, demonstrating how centralized key management creates systemic vulnerabilities.
This custody constraint blocks Bitcoin’s enormous latent adoption potential. Institutional investors overwhelmingly want to increase allocations, but custody concerns remain the primary barrier preventing large-scale adoption.
The Historical Pattern: How Tech Escapes the Hobbyist Phase
Historically, transformative technologies, from personal computers to the internet, have evolved through three distinct phases: a niche hobbyist stage, the emergence of institutional infrastructure, and mass adoption. Understanding this pattern reveals exactly where Bitcoin custody stands today and where it’s heading next.
Phase 1: Hobbyist/Tinkerer Era
PC parallel: Early personal computers required users to assemble hardware components from scratch, write code for basic functions, and troubleshoot endless system conflicts. Only dedicated enthusiasts possessed the technical knowledge and patience for these early systems. Computing remained a niche pursuit for engineers and hobbyists throughout the 1970s and early 1980s because the expertise required excluded everyone else.
iPhone parallel: Pre-iPhone smartphones and PDAs like Palm Pilots were clunky, expensive tools designed for technical professionals. They required stylus navigation, complex synchronization procedures, and frequent troubleshooting. The user interface assumed technical competence that made mainstream consumer adoption impossible, limiting the market to early adopters willing to tolerate significant operational complexity.
SSL parallel: Early internet commerce existed in fundamentally untrusted territory. Online transactions required users to understand encryption concepts, manually verify certificates, and accept significant security risks. Most consumers refused to enter credit card information online, viewing the internet as inherently unsafe for financial transactions. E-commerce growth remained severely constrained by this trust barrier.
Bitcoin custody equivalent: Today’s self-custody solutions occupy this exact same hobbyist phase. Hardware wallets, paper wallets, and DIY multisig arrangements require deep technical knowledge of cryptographic concepts, operational security practices, and disaster recovery procedures. Like early PCs, they’re undeniably powerful but accessible only to dedicated enthusiasts willing to invest substantial time and expertise, with mistakes along the way.
Phase 2: Institutional-Grade Infrastructure Emerges
PC: The explosion of the IBM PC in the 1980s, combined with the rise of open standards like x86 architecture and operating systems such as MS-DOS and Linux, transformed personal computers from bespoke hobbyist kits into enterprise-ready infrastructure. Hardware became standardized, peripherals interoperable, and operating systems abstracted complexity behind usable interfaces. Businesses could finally deploy PCs at scale, confident that applications and hardware would work across standardized environments.
iPhone: Apple abstracted mobile computing complexity behind an intuitive touchscreen interface that preserved underlying power. Suddenly, anyone could access powerful capabilities without needing to understand UNIX commands, networking protocols, or mobile operating systems. The App Store created a thriving ecosystem that made the device indispensable rather than merely impressive, transforming smartphones from business tools into essential personal infrastructure.
SSL: Secure Sockets Layer technology made encryption completely invisible to end users while providing robust cryptographic security for online transactions. The “https” protocol and padlock icons gave consumers confidence to enter sensitive information online without requiring any cryptographic knowledge. This psychological breakthrough unleashed the e-commerce revolution by solving the trust problem that had constrained online commerce.
Bitcoin custody equivalent: Multi-Institution Custody represents Bitcoin’s equivalent infrastructure breakthrough. MIC distributes trust across independent institutions while maintaining on-chain verifiability and eliminating single points of failure. It provides institutional-grade security through distributed multisig architecture, professional operational standards, and regulatory compliance, all while abstracting complexity from end users who simply want secure Bitcoin storage.
Phase 3: Mass Adoption
PC: By late 1990s, personal computers had become the default tool in offices and homes worldwide. Open hardware standards and widely adopted operating systems created powerful network effects: software developers focused on the PC ecosystem, while users gained access to a growing universe of applications - from Excel spreadsheets that transformed financial analysis, to video games that created whole new industries, to enterprise software that runs global supply chains. PCs became invisible infrastructure, indispensable to modern life.
iPhone: The numbers tell the adoption story: 1.4 million units sold in 2007, jumping to 20 million in 2008, reaching 100 million total sales by 2011. Apple’s smartphone platform put computing power in everyone’s pocket, transcending its original purpose to become essential infrastructure for commerce, communication, and daily life. The device achieved true ubiquity when users stopped thinking about it as advanced technology and started treating it as basic utility.
SSL: HTTPS adoption jumped from 30% of web traffic in 2014 to over 95% by 2021, with most of that growth occurring after 2016. Users stopped thinking about encryption entirely while relying on it for banking, shopping, and communication. The technology achieved its ultimate success by becoming completely transparent to end users.
Bitcoin custody future: MIC is likely to follow this same trajectory to become the default custody standard for individuals, corporations, and sovereign wealth funds. As regulatory frameworks mature and institutional adoption accelerates, distributed custody will evolve from an innovative solution to invisible infrastructure that enables Bitcoin’s transformation into global monetary infrastructure.
This pattern reveals that Bitcoin custody currently sits at the end of Phase 1, with institutional infrastructure beginning to emerge that will drive Phase 2 adoption. The historical precedent suggests this transition will happen faster than previous technology adoptions because the stakes are higher and the underlying technology foundation already exists.
MIC as the iPhone of Bitcoin Custody
Abstraction Without Compromise
The iPhone’s revolutionary insight was hiding UNIX complexity behind an intuitive interface that preserved underlying computational power. MIC accomplishes the identical feat for Bitcoin custody, abstracting multisig complexity, shard reconstruction, and security workflows while preserving user control and on-chain verifiability that make Bitcoin valuable.
Consider how this transformation works in practice. A corporate treasurer managing a billion-dollar Bitcoin position through MIC experiences the improved simplicity relative to a traditional wire transfer. Behind the scenes, professional key management services handle hardware security modules, air-gapped key generation, secure communication protocols, and disaster recovery procedures. But the user interface presents streamlined workflows for transaction approval and account monitoring that require no cryptographic expertise.
Ecosystem Enabler
The iPhone’s App Store parallel reveals MIC’s broader transformative potential. Apple’s platform enabled thousands of applications that made the device indispensable, creating network effects that accelerated adoption beyond the device’s inherent capabilities. MIC’s custody layer will enable sophisticated financial services built on Bitcoin infrastructure: treasury management, prime brokerage, lending, and trading services can all build on MIC’s foundational security model.
MIC as the Linux of Custody
The “Operating System” Layer
Linux has shown how open, standardized infrastructure can transform a fragmented, hobbyist technology into something enterprise-grade. Originally a passion project for developers, Linux evolved into the backbone of modern computing by providing a common operating system that could run across standardized hardware. Its open standards and transparent protocols allowed institutions to build secure, interoperable systems at scale, from server farms to smartphones to mission-critical enterprise software.
MIC serves the same function for Bitcoin custody. Like Linux, it standardizes complexity behind clear protocols while remaining verifiable and resilient. MIC creates shared rules for secure key management, transaction approval, and compliance monitoring. This standardization enables interoperability across exchanges, lenders, and financial service providers - something today’s fragmented custody models can’t offer.
The result is predictable APIs, consistent operational workflows, and the ability to integrate custody seamlessly across multiple providers. Just as Linux enabled enterprises to build on a reliable, open foundation, MIC enables institutions to build the financial layer of Bitcoin with confidence.
Standardization = Scale
Linux didn’t conquer the world by being the flashiest system - it succeeded because standardization created unstoppable network effects. Once enterprises adopted Linux as a reliable open-source operating system, developers concentrated their efforts on it. That in turn made Linux more valuable, which drove further adoption. Today, Linux quietly powers most of the internet, the cloud, Android smartphones, and mission-critical infrastructure from stock exchanges to space programs.
MIC is generating identical network effects for Bitcoin custody. As more institutions adopt standardized distributed custody protocols, interoperability improves, integration costs fall, and ecosystem providers align around the same core model.
The benefits compound rapidly with broader adoption. Consistent custody standards allow institutional clients to work with multiple service providers, establish backup relationships, and negotiate competitive terms through genuine competition rather than vendor lock-in. Regulators can write clear frameworks instead of dealing with bespoke one-offs. Insurance markets can finally underwrite custody risk using predictable models based on proven, standardized operational procedures.
This foundation of open, verifiable standardization is what enables scale. Just as Linux became the invisible backbone of global computing, MIC will become the invisible backbone of Bitcoin custody - capable of supporting sovereign treasuries, corporate reserves, and institutional portfolios at unprecedented scale.
MIC as the SSL of Bitcoin
The Trust Layer That Unlocks Adoption
SSL’s most profound impact wasn’t technical but psychological. The “https” protocol and padlock icon made consumers comfortable entering credit card numbers online, unleashing the e-commerce revolution by solving the fundamental trust problem that had constrained online commerce. The underlying encryption technology was sophisticated, but users only needed simple visual confirmation that their transaction was secure.
MIC provides identical psychological comfort for institutions and high-net-worth individuals considering large Bitcoin holdings. Rather than trusting single custodians with catastrophic failure risk, institutions can verify that their assets are secured through independently operated, geographically distributed entities with regulatory oversight and professional operational standards. The on-chain verifiability adds cryptographic proof of holdings that traditional custody arrangements cannot match.
From Niche to Invisible Infrastructure
SSL followed a predictable evolution from a specialized security tool to invisible infrastructure. Early SSL adoption was limited to banking and e-commerce sites in the 1990s, expanded to major websites by 2010, and became universal by 2020 when browsers began flagging non-HTTPS sites as insecure. Users stopped thinking about encryption while relying on it for increasingly critical activities.
MIC is likely to follow the same trajectory from sophisticated early adopters to institutional standard to invisible infrastructure. As adoption grows, distributed custody will become the expected standard for professional Bitcoin custody, much like HTTPS is now expected for any legitimate website. Users will stop thinking about the underlying security architecture while relying on its protection for increasingly valuable Bitcoin holdings.
The transformation will be complete when institutions stop choosing between “secure” and “convenient” custody options because MIC makes the distinction meaningless. Just as modern internet users don’t think about encryption when making online purchases, future Bitcoin users won’t think about custody architecture when managing digital assets.
Accessibility vs Control: The New Spectrum
The emergence of MIC fundamentally reshapes how we evaluate custody solutions by eliminating false trade-offs that have constrained Bitcoin adoption. Traditional frameworks forced institutions to choose between security and usability, but MIC achieves both simultaneously.
This comparison reveals MIC’s unique positioning: combining self custody security benefits with centralized custody’s usability and scalability advantages. The “Medium-High” control rating reflects users maintaining ultimate authority over their assets while delegating operational complexity to professional institutions with specialized expertise. More importantly, MIC eliminates the tradeoffs that have prevented institutional adoption, namely high counterparty risks, and unmanageable operations barriers, both limits for fiduciaries.
The Strategic Imperative for Bitcoin Institutions
Exchanges, funds, and financial advisors face growing pressure to adopt MIC solutions or risk losing institutional clients who can no longer accept single-custodian relationships after high-profile failures like FTX. The window for positioning around this transition is narrowing as market standards solidify around distributed custody models.
Network effects will accelerate MIC adoption as more institutions recognize competitive advantages from enhanced security positioning, regulatory compliance capabilities, and client confidence that become harder to replicate as ecosystem standards emerge. Early adopters gain sustainable advantages that compound over time, while late adopters face increasing costs and reduced competitive positioning.
The ecosystem benefits compound with broader adoption, creating positive feedback loops that mirror open-source PC standards adoption in the 1990s. More MIC providers create competitive pricing and service improvements, including scaling signing quorum sizes. Standardized protocols reduce integration costs and enable interoperability between providers. Regulatory frameworks become more predictable with established operational precedents. Insurance products become available with better terms based on proven track records.
Institutions that delay MIC adoption risk exclusion from ecosystem development that will define competitive positioning in Bitcoin-based financial services. The costs of catching up increase as network effects strengthen around new standards, much like companies that avoided internet adoption in the 1990s found themselves at permanent disadvantages that became impossible to overcome.
Conclusion
What makes Bitcoin so special, its emphasis on self-sovereign custody, enabling true ownership without intermediaries, has propelled it to a $2.3 trillion asset today by empowering individuals and fostering a resilient, decentralized network. However, this same purist approach to self-custody is not what will take Bitcoin from $2 trillion to $20 trillion; that requires institutional-grade infrastructure like MIC to bridge the gap between sovereignty and scalability, which can bridge the gap between early adopters and those who wish to simply save their capital while preserving Bitcoin’s core ethos.
Interested in learning more about Early Riders?
earlyriders.com